Help for replacement of old QNAP models approaching End of life

[husain777]

Dear Members,
My organization is using few QNAP models and I wanted to confirm whether this model has reached there End of life and what would be the replacement model for each listed below
TS-259 Pro+
TS-459 Pro II
TS-459 Pro+
TS-559 Pro II
TS-559 Pro+
TS-639
TS-439

Thanks,
Hussi

[Toxic17]

Google is your friend...

https://www.qnap.com/en/product/eol.php

I think the x59 firmware support will be pulled around October this year...

[husain777]

Thanks Simon for your help. I found in some article the above listed models are approaching end of life from google but wanted to confirm officially to plan the budget

Thanks,
Hussi

[Tonite]

Hello,
I can't find my TS-439 (not Pro or other adornements) in the list. Killed even in the Qnap memory?

[Toxic17]

Hello,
I can't find my TS-439 (not Pro or other adornements) in the list. Killed even in the Qnap memory?

Did you even look?

I found them straight away.[img]//uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201708 ... 588e9e.jpg[/img]

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

[comdm]

Tonite wrote:
Hello,
I can't find my TS-439 (not Pro or other adornements) in the list. Killed even in the Qnap memory?

Toxic17 wrote:
Did you even look?

I found them straight away. //uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/201708 ... 588e9e.jpg

The Model TS-439 is there also not listed!
How could it be?

[dolbyman]

was there ever a x39 non Pro ?

in any case the Pro would be a newer model, so the non Pro would be EOL for sure

[P3R]

...what would be the replacement model for each listed below...

There are no specific replacement models for your old models. All of the current Qnap models have much more features and almost all of them are more powerful.

It's better that you think about what you want out of your NASes, today and in the future and choose models based on that.

Some things to consider:

• All of your NASes are Intel-based. Is that a requirement or is ARM or AMD possible as well?
• All your NASes are desktop type. Are rack mounted models possible or maybe even preferred?
• Would it be an advantage for you to standardize on a single model line or will they used in very different applications and situations where it would be preferrable to pick the right tool for each situation?
• Today NASes have many more possibilities and features than just straight file sharing. Would any of that be interesting for you, now or in future?