Off with his head.Spider99 wrote:Yes i am a naughty boy
Whatever time it takes to rebuild and restore is time that your apps/data are unavailable. Just something else to consider.
Off with his head.Spider99 wrote:Yes i am a naughty boy
Think again! The RAID 6 and it's data is still perfectly available with two failed disks!MrVideo wrote:So, if the first two drives were to go bad you lose that RAID5, but not the other. If the same to drives go bad in the RAID6, you lose all the data.
Really? What do you base that statement on?have about twice the performance of 2*4 disk RAID 5s
Spreading data over twice the number of disks gives about twice the performance as only half the amount the amount of data needs to be read/written from/to each disk. I should have added that it only applies to writing, given a fast CPU. Here's some testing to confirm it.Spider99 wrote:Really? What do you base that statement on?
Oops! Brain/keyboard disconnect.P3R wrote:Think again! The RAID 6 and it's data is still perfectly available with two failed disks!MrVideo wrote:So, if the first two drives were to go bad you lose that RAID5, but not the other. If the same to drives go bad in the RAID6, you lose all the data.