Definitely not protective, you can check out the various issues I've had in my post history
I've only had a QNAP device for a couple months. I've been generally happy with it but it definitely has its faults. They're not my favorite storage vendor by a long shot though.
That said, I still think it's silly when anyone believes ANY technology should be flawless and wants to blame all the ills of the world on the company that makes it. i.e., a hardware company using largely open source software getting attacked by bad actors with malware and "OMG!! Do something QNAP!!" lol
In this situation is ** that a hardware component failed and has to be RMAed. I don't think we can automatically judge QNAP on this lengthy RMA period though given the author is going through a third party to process the RMA. We don't know how long QNAP has actually had it in their possession and - at least with this issue - there could be supply chain constraints to them in receiving a replacement component (making this abnormal and understandable). I've dealt direct with QNAP in USA to get some minor replacement parts and they drop shipped them the next day so I know this isn't a universal case of QNAP RMA department being unresponsive. Anyway, if there are multitudes of people dealing with lengthy return periods I'd like to know that, even this guys situation being a one off (that we know of) it's data and I'm not against it in any way, my complaint was that he cross posted.