Ah I wasn't quite sure about that thanks for clearing that up. I've had a look at going to 5TB drives but both 5TB drives on the TS412 compatibility list (Seagate ST5000NM0024 abd WDC50EFRX) seem to be hard to find - the one store that had the WDC 5TB had them more expensive than the 6TB at other places! Given that I currently have 4x2TB drives, the most cost effective solution at the moment is to purchase 4X4TB WDC drives which would double my capacity - enough for the next few years at least. Toying with the idea of upgrading to a TS451 with 6TB or 8TB drives but the cost is more than double.P3R wrote:True.dmierowsky wrote:I saw that limit - my understanding was that it was a volume limit - so each volume you create can't be more than 16TB.Here's the bad news: you can't split or create multiple volumes on a RAID in a cat1 model like the old TS-412.I'm running with RAID-5 so 3x6TB useable would be 18TB which I'd have to split into 2x9TB volumes (or some other split).
4*6 TB RAID 5 will end up at about 16.2 TB uasble storage so just above the 16 TB limit
RAID 6 or RAID 10 works but will give you 50 % less storage capacity,
10.8 TB.
Actually 5 TB disks are a much better fit for RAID 5 in a 4-bay cat1 model as 4*5 TB RAID 5 will become a 13.5 TB volume.
WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
-
- New here
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
- dolbyman
- Guru
- Posts: 35005
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:11 am
- Location: Vancouver BC , Canada
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
you can basically use any manufacturer nas drive .. they all should be compatible..only desktop drive are a bit more tricky
also make sure you have a backup strategy for that data..it will one day save your bacon (if the data is of any importance)
also make sure you have a backup strategy for that data..it will one day save your bacon (if the data is of any importance)
-
- New here
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
All under control - it's my 10+ years of photography work! I back up regularly to a pair of external drives - one at the office and one at home. I usually have a copy of my best images on my laptop as well.dolbyman wrote:you can basically use any manufacturer nas drive .. they all should be compatible..only desktop drive are a bit more tricky
also make sure you have a backup strategy for that data..it will one day save your bacon (if the data is of any importance)
-
- Guru
- Posts: 13190
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:39 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden (UTC+01:00)
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Yes I've also noticed that 5 TB disks are being phased out. The last time I was shopping I bought a 6 TB instead at the same price.dmierowsky wrote:I've had a look at going to 5TB drives but both 5TB drives on the TS412 compatibility list (Seagate ST5000NM0024 abd WDC50EFRX) seem to be hard to find - the one store that had the WDC 5TB had them more expensive than the 6TB at other places!
Please note that the TS-412 is being phased out and that QTS 4.3.3 is the last software release for it ever.Given that I currently have 4x2TB drives, the most cost effective solution at the moment is to purchase 4X4TB WDC drives which would double my capacity - enough for the next few years at least.
As long as the TS-412 hardware don't fail it will of course continue to work on that last firmware but in a couple of months it may be outdated. When it is, it's strongly recommended to keep the NAS completely isolated within your local network and don't use it for any internet services.
If you use the NAS to serve anything to the public internet, you probably shouldn't invest anything in the TS-412 and start planning for this major upgrade instead. If the NAS is only used within your local network, you could go on with the TS-412 until it breaks.Toying with the idea of upgrading to a TS451 with 6TB or 8TB drives but the cost is more than double.
RAID have never ever been a replacement for backups. Without backups on a different system (preferably placed at another site), you will eventually lose data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
-
- New here
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
I doubt I'll ever use it for the public internet. It's use is primarily to hold all my (growing) photographic work. Still, I'll think more seriously about upgrading given the age and (non) future of the TS-412. Plus the migration will be easier - simple copy from one to the other and I can always keep the TS412 as an extra backup - lol you can never have enough backups IMHO!P3R wrote:Yes I've also noticed that 5 TB disks are being phased out. The last time I was shopping I bought a 6 TB instead at the same price.dmierowsky wrote:I've had a look at going to 5TB drives but both 5TB drives on the TS412 compatibility list (Seagate ST5000NM0024 abd WDC50EFRX) seem to be hard to find - the one store that had the WDC 5TB had them more expensive than the 6TB at other places!Please note that the TS-412 is being phased out and that QTS 4.3.3 is the last software release for it ever.Given that I currently have 4x2TB drives, the most cost effective solution at the moment is to purchase 4X4TB WDC drives which would double my capacity - enough for the next few years at least.
As long as the TS-412 hardware don't fail it will of course continue to work on that last firmware but in a couple of months it may be outdated. When it is, it's strongly recommended to keep the NAS completely isolated within your local network and don't use it for any internet services.If you use the NAS to serve anything to the public internet, you probably shouldn't invest anything in the TS-412 and start planning for this major upgrade instead. If the NAS is only used within your local network, you could go on with the TS-412 until it breaks.Toying with the idea of upgrading to a TS451 with 6TB or 8TB drives but the cost is more than double.
- storageman
- Ask me anything
- Posts: 5507
- Joined: Thu Sep 22, 2011 10:57 pm
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Recommended if the price is right, 2.5 MTBF, twice that of Red Pro/IronWolf Pro.kherr4377 wrote:i was just on Amazon, and for SnG i looked up WD GOLD ..... they're cheaper than PROs and better specs ...... <1 in 10^15 ....
Even P3R must like that!
-
- Guru
- Posts: 13190
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:39 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden (UTC+01:00)
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Absolutely, I especially like that on WD Gold they don't need to use any trick numbers to make the specifications look competitive.storageman wrote:Even P3R must like that!
RAID have never ever been a replacement for backups. Without backups on a different system (preferably placed at another site), you will eventually lose data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
-
- New here
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Thu Jan 12, 2012 11:16 pm
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Go figure - in Australia the WD Gold drives are more expensive than Red Pro!storageman wrote:Recommended if the price is right, 2.5 MTBF, twice that of Red Pro/IronWolf Pro.kherr4377 wrote:i was just on Amazon, and for SnG i looked up WD GOLD ..... they're cheaper than PROs and better specs ...... <1 in 10^15 ....
Even P3R must like that!
-
- Been there, done that
- Posts: 898
- Joined: Mon Jun 03, 2013 3:33 am
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Thew price (anyway on Amazon) must have come down. they used to be probably 10% (or more) than Pro's. the only real problem with them, it looks like they are power hogs.
Production :
TVS-673 4.3.4 0387
4 X 3TB WD RED : 1 X 4TB HGST DESKSTAR R5
32GB
LAN-10G1SR-D, FiberHal for Cisco SFP-10G-SR
NETGEAR ProSAFE SS3300-28X
Backup :
TS-469L 4.3.4 0387
4 X 3TB WD RED R5
3GB
Located detached garage .. cheap offsite solution ...
2nd TS-469L awaiting drives and reassignment for front-line duty .......
TVS-673 4.3.4 0387
4 X 3TB WD RED : 1 X 4TB HGST DESKSTAR R5
32GB
LAN-10G1SR-D, FiberHal for Cisco SFP-10G-SR
NETGEAR ProSAFE SS3300-28X
Backup :
TS-469L 4.3.4 0387
4 X 3TB WD RED R5
3GB
Located detached garage .. cheap offsite solution ...
2nd TS-469L awaiting drives and reassignment for front-line duty .......
-
- Guru
- Posts: 13190
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:39 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden (UTC+01:00)
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Normally they should be. But as pricing depends on a lot of different factors and varies sometimes you strike gold(!) if monitoring reseller pricing. Six years ago I was lucky enough to buy a bunch of 3 TB Hitachi Ultrastar enterprise disks at the same price as Deskstar desktop disks.dmierowsky wrote:Go figure - in Australia the WD Gold drives are more expensive than Red Pro!
RAID have never ever been a replacement for backups. Without backups on a different system (preferably placed at another site), you will eventually lose data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 12:18 am
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Joining in, as upscaling my TS-412 is exactly my situation as well.
Currently have only 2x2TB drives, now looking to massively expand to accommodate music from very large (10,000+) CD collection, so going for biggest usable total capacity over 4 drive bays.
This has been a very helpful thread about the maximum capacity (single 16TB) volume size and advice that updates now at end of support life.
(Thanks, dolbyman)
Not looking to use NAS as anything but internal data & media storage, so lack of future update support not a big issue as will not expose it to internet.
Plan A is to go to RAID5 & buy 5 HDdrives (4bays+1 to swap out in emergency).
As noted, 5TB drives now way expensive for their capacity (can only find WD Reds at over £300 each).
If I put in 4x6TB drives, will the system just give the max it can (ie slight waste of HD capacity) ?
Also, the recommended drive list is a bit lean, but is that just because it is near end of QNAP support?
I saw the advice that “you can basically use any manufacturer nas drive .. they all should be compatible..only desktop drive are a bit more tricky”
(Thanks again, dolbyman)
Looking at current 6TB for-NAS drive prices, I could go for:
Seagate Iron Wolf (£183ea), Toshiba N300 (£196) or Western Digital Red (£205), so a total extra upgrade cost of £0, £65 or £112 respectively.
Apart from personal manufacturer dislikes, does one of these shout “best” more than the others because of speed, reliability, energy consumption,warranty?
Finally, is there a good “step by step guide” you can point me at to migrate from 2x2TB to 4x(6?)TB drives?
PS for info, I do have a regular off-board backup system, both via overnight backup (rotated periodically offsite) and via other external drives in rotation.
I will need to upgrade to backup capacities and probably split them up, though
Currently have only 2x2TB drives, now looking to massively expand to accommodate music from very large (10,000+) CD collection, so going for biggest usable total capacity over 4 drive bays.
This has been a very helpful thread about the maximum capacity (single 16TB) volume size and advice that updates now at end of support life.
(Thanks, dolbyman)
Not looking to use NAS as anything but internal data & media storage, so lack of future update support not a big issue as will not expose it to internet.
Plan A is to go to RAID5 & buy 5 HDdrives (4bays+1 to swap out in emergency).
As noted, 5TB drives now way expensive for their capacity (can only find WD Reds at over £300 each).
If I put in 4x6TB drives, will the system just give the max it can (ie slight waste of HD capacity) ?
Also, the recommended drive list is a bit lean, but is that just because it is near end of QNAP support?
I saw the advice that “you can basically use any manufacturer nas drive .. they all should be compatible..only desktop drive are a bit more tricky”
(Thanks again, dolbyman)
Looking at current 6TB for-NAS drive prices, I could go for:
Seagate Iron Wolf (£183ea), Toshiba N300 (£196) or Western Digital Red (£205), so a total extra upgrade cost of £0, £65 or £112 respectively.
Apart from personal manufacturer dislikes, does one of these shout “best” more than the others because of speed, reliability, energy consumption,warranty?
Finally, is there a good “step by step guide” you can point me at to migrate from 2x2TB to 4x(6?)TB drives?
PS for info, I do have a regular off-board backup system, both via overnight backup (rotated periodically offsite) and via other external drives in rotation.
I will need to upgrade to backup capacities and probably split them up, though
- dolbyman
- Guru
- Posts: 35005
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:11 am
- Location: Vancouver BC , Canada
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
with cat1 devices it will just not work.it throws an error
to expand to or beyond 16TB you need a cat2 device and start from scratch (no legacy migration of the old disks)
to expand to or beyond 16TB you need a cat2 device and start from scratch (no legacy migration of the old disks)
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri May 04, 2012 12:18 am
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
Thanks for the quick response; Rats!dolbyman wrote:with cat1 devices it will just not work.it throws an error
to expand to or beyond 16TB you need a cat2 device and start from scratch (no legacy migration of the old disks)
Move to PlanB. Would RAID1 & 4x8TB disks be allowable?
Or Plan C; would 2x8TB + 2x6TB RAID1 give a workable 14TB volume?
- dolbyman
- Guru
- Posts: 35005
- Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2011 2:11 am
- Location: Vancouver BC , Canada
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
PlanB: Does not work on QNAP
PlanC: Due to the lack of storage pools, you cannot combine RAID Volumes on CAT1 devices , you make two separate volumes
PlanD: RAID6 with 4x6TB drives
PlanC: Due to the lack of storage pools, you cannot combine RAID Volumes on CAT1 devices , you make two separate volumes
PlanD: RAID6 with 4x6TB drives
-
- Guru
- Posts: 13190
- Joined: Sat Dec 29, 2007 1:39 am
- Location: Stockholm, Sweden (UTC+01:00)
Re: WD 6TB Prod WD6002FFWX in TS-412
PlanE: Migrate/expand to 3*8 TB RAID 5 (or 4*8 TB RAID 6) = 14.4 TB usable storage.
PlanF: Find someone with 4 relatively new 5 TB disks that want to upgrade them to 6 TB.
PlanG: Buy a new low cost NAS, like a TS-431P.
PlanF: Find someone with 4 relatively new 5 TB disks that want to upgrade them to 6 TB.
PlanG: Buy a new low cost NAS, like a TS-431P.
RAID have never ever been a replacement for backups. Without backups on a different system (preferably placed at another site), you will eventually lose data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!
A non-RAID configuration (including RAID 0, which isn't really RAID) with a backup on a separate media protects your data far better than any RAID-volume without backup.
All data storage consists of both the primary storage and the backups. It's your money and your data, spend the storage budget wisely or pay with your data!