Here is the compatibility page for the QM2-4P-384
https://www.qnap.com/en-us/compatibilit ... ategory=23
You are correct, the KC2000's are not listed, so if it does not work - you are on your own.
Nothing wrong with a standard Samsung EVO 970.
Bob Zelin
TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
-
- Experience counts
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:55 am
- Location: Orlando, FL.
- Contact:
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Bob Zelin / Rescue 1, Inc.
http://www.bobzelin.com
http://www.bobzelin.com
-
- New here
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sat Jul 20, 2019 6:28 am
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Thanks Bob for feedback, much appreciated (Will likely contact u for direct help as our new offices gear up). Since you have installed both the 1677xu-rp and the 1683xu-rp, I may as well ask if you notice a performance difference at all between them? We are looking to buy 2 units for now, one for each office site (Shanghai, Toronto)
Best price I can see for 1677xu-rp (16G version) is $4300 usd
Best price I can see for 1683xu-rp (16G version) is $4850 usd
The $500 price difference is immaterial (Like you, our time is far more important)
We're not stuck on getting intel or amd....we're fine with either.
Both the Shanghai and Toronto site would be used the same way (Just two, not more than 3 video editors will work off the NAS box).
Attitude is more of, okay sure let's save a dollar where we can, but at the same time spending $500 on $9k box+disks we don't mind if there is a corresponding performance benefit for the extra money.
Having read the published specs which are hard to compare, just wondering which way you or folks in this forum might lean based on real-world experience?
Thanks,
Aloysius Lo
Oasis Global Partners
Best price I can see for 1677xu-rp (16G version) is $4300 usd
Best price I can see for 1683xu-rp (16G version) is $4850 usd
The $500 price difference is immaterial (Like you, our time is far more important)
We're not stuck on getting intel or amd....we're fine with either.
Both the Shanghai and Toronto site would be used the same way (Just two, not more than 3 video editors will work off the NAS box).
Attitude is more of, okay sure let's save a dollar where we can, but at the same time spending $500 on $9k box+disks we don't mind if there is a corresponding performance benefit for the extra money.
Having read the published specs which are hard to compare, just wondering which way you or folks in this forum might lean based on real-world experience?
Thanks,
Aloysius Lo
Oasis Global Partners
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:05 pm
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Qnap just listed Kc2000 in the compatibility list, which is the right timing as I just received the 1677xu-RP.Bob Zelin wrote: ↑Wed Jul 24, 2019 9:41 pm Here is the compatibility page for the QM2-4P-384
https://www.qnap.com/en-us/compatibilit ... ategory=23
You are correct, the KC2000's are not listed, so if it does not work - you are on your own.
Nothing wrong with a standard Samsung EVO 970.
Bob Zelin
- Trexx
- Ask me anything
- Posts: 5393
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:50 am
- Location: Minnesota
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Oasis Global wrote: ↑Thu Jul 25, 2019 1:10 pm Thanks Bob for feedback, much appreciated (Will likely contact u for direct help as our new offices gear up). Since you have installed both the 1677xu-rp and the 1683xu-rp, I may as well ask if you notice a performance difference at all between them? We are looking to buy 2 units for now, one for each office site (Shanghai, Toronto)
Best price I can see for 1677xu-rp (16G version) is $4300 usd
Best price I can see for 1683xu-rp (16G version) is $4850 usd
The $500 price difference is immaterial (Like you, our time is far more important)
We're not stuck on getting intel or amd....we're fine with either.
Both the Shanghai and Toronto site would be used the same way (Just two, not more than 3 video editors will work off the NAS box).
Attitude is more of, okay sure let's save a dollar where we can, but at the same time spending $500 on $9k box+disks we don't mind if there is a corresponding performance benefit for the extra money.
Having read the published specs which are hard to compare, just wondering which way you or folks in this forum might lean based on real-world experience?
Thanks,
Aloysius Lo
Oasis Global Partners
From a pure CPU performance perspective, the Ryzen CPU is much more powerful than the Intel between those 2 CPU's. https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/In ... 3432vs3240
Now if you are mainly just using this for a NAS box for your video editors, this likely won't come into play much (if at all) unless your are running VM's / Docker containers on the device as well. For just pure storage use, the CPU probably won't make much (if any) difference.
Bob Zelin can speak much more authoritatively than I can regarding any other real-world differences he has seen between the 2 platforms.
Last edited by Trexx on Fri Sep 06, 2019 7:56 am, edited 1 time in total.
Paul
Model: TS-877-1600 FW: 4.5.3.x
QTS (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x 1TB WD Blue m.2's
Data (HDD): [RAID-5] 6 x 3TB HGST DeskStar
VMs (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x1TB SK Hynix Gold
Ext. (HDD): TR-004 [Raid-5] 4 x 4TB HGST Ultastor
RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 64GB DDR4-2666
UPS: CP AVR1350
Model:TVS-673 32GB & TS-228a Offline[/color]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Plex NAS Compatibility Guide | QNAP Plex FAQ | Moogle's QNAP Faq
Model: TS-877-1600 FW: 4.5.3.x
QTS (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x 1TB WD Blue m.2's
Data (HDD): [RAID-5] 6 x 3TB HGST DeskStar
VMs (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x1TB SK Hynix Gold
Ext. (HDD): TR-004 [Raid-5] 4 x 4TB HGST Ultastor
RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 64GB DDR4-2666
UPS: CP AVR1350
Model:TVS-673 32GB & TS-228a Offline[/color]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Plex NAS Compatibility Guide | QNAP Plex FAQ | Moogle's QNAP Faq
-
- Experience counts
- Posts: 1375
- Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2016 12:55 am
- Location: Orlando, FL.
- Contact:
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
meh - I can't speak with much more authority. I have put in both the TS-1677XU-RP and the TS-1683XU-RP. They both perform equally. Some people like Intel - and QNAP puts this on the "enterprise page" - and puts the TS-1677XU-RP on the "SMB" page - so they think that the enterprise page is the "better" system. To me - for video editing applications - its the same box (and the AMD TS-1677XU-RP is cheaper).
Talk to you soon Aloysius
Bob Zelin
Talk to you soon Aloysius
Bob Zelin
Bob Zelin / Rescue 1, Inc.
http://www.bobzelin.com
http://www.bobzelin.com
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:05 pm
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Advice needed.
I have 16 x 12TB HDD and 4 x 1TB Kingston NVMe with QM2-4P-384 with the TS-1677XU-RP
Should I do:
Qtier with 4 x 1 TB on Raid10 , 16 x 12TB on Raid60 , or
Qtier with 4 x 1 TB on Raid5, 16 x 12 TB on Raid60 ?
The main intention of using Qnap is for enterprise file sharing (media files and office archive), backup files and potentially SQL DB for some transaction and photos logging.
I have 16 x 12TB HDD and 4 x 1TB Kingston NVMe with QM2-4P-384 with the TS-1677XU-RP
Should I do:
Qtier with 4 x 1 TB on Raid10 , 16 x 12TB on Raid60 , or
Qtier with 4 x 1 TB on Raid5, 16 x 12 TB on Raid60 ?
The main intention of using Qnap is for enterprise file sharing (media files and office archive), backup files and potentially SQL DB for some transaction and photos logging.
- Trexx
- Ask me anything
- Posts: 5393
- Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2011 7:50 am
- Location: Minnesota
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
I would look here to start.
https://live.qnap.com/en/video/show/461
Also since you are already using NVMe, I doubt raid-10 is going to make a huge difference, and would go raid-5.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
https://live.qnap.com/en/video/show/461
Also since you are already using NVMe, I doubt raid-10 is going to make a huge difference, and would go raid-5.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Paul
Model: TS-877-1600 FW: 4.5.3.x
QTS (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x 1TB WD Blue m.2's
Data (HDD): [RAID-5] 6 x 3TB HGST DeskStar
VMs (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x1TB SK Hynix Gold
Ext. (HDD): TR-004 [Raid-5] 4 x 4TB HGST Ultastor
RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 64GB DDR4-2666
UPS: CP AVR1350
Model:TVS-673 32GB & TS-228a Offline[/color]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Plex NAS Compatibility Guide | QNAP Plex FAQ | Moogle's QNAP Faq
Model: TS-877-1600 FW: 4.5.3.x
QTS (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x 1TB WD Blue m.2's
Data (HDD): [RAID-5] 6 x 3TB HGST DeskStar
VMs (SSD): [RAID-1] 2 x1TB SK Hynix Gold
Ext. (HDD): TR-004 [Raid-5] 4 x 4TB HGST Ultastor
RAM: Kingston HyperX Fury 64GB DDR4-2666
UPS: CP AVR1350
Model:TVS-673 32GB & TS-228a Offline[/color]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2018 Plex NAS Compatibility Guide | QNAP Plex FAQ | Moogle's QNAP Faq
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:05 pm
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Thanks for the link. Good info.Trexx wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 11:25 am I would look here to start.
https://live.qnap.com/en/video/show/461
Also since you are already using NVMe, I doubt raid-10 is going to make a huge difference, and would go raid-5.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
By the way, I sort of remember the QTS will be installed on first drive set. How about my case with NVMe drive on QM2 cars? Will it install on those Nvme drive?
-
- Starting out
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Fri Apr 12, 2019 9:05 pm
Re: TS-1677XU-RP vs Ts-1677x
Solved the question.
Installed the QM2 only and QTS is automatically installed in the Nvme disk. Now just need to plug in the normal HDD and configure the raid for both ssd and hdd in qtier.
Installed the QM2 only and QTS is automatically installed in the Nvme disk. Now just need to plug in the normal HDD and configure the raid for both ssd and hdd in qtier.