No worries, you didn't.dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:03 am No complaining, sorry if it came across like that I truly appreciate your help!
So, is Medusa starting correctly now?
No worries, you didn't.dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:03 am No complaining, sorry if it came across like that I truly appreciate your help!
So, is Medusa starting correctly now?
no, it just stops with a different error, there are no more entries after the attempted Git Pull and "starting" it stopsSo, is Medusa starting correctly now?
[~] # /etc/init.d/omedusa.sh start
= (OMedusa) is not active
* updating (OMedusa): failed!
= result: 1
= PullGitRepo(): '/opt/lib/git-core/git-remote-https: error while loading shared libraries: libssl.so.1.0.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory'
* starting (OMedusa):
OK, let's try reinstalling Entware:dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:11 am no, it just stops with a different error, there are no more entries after the attempted Git Pull and "starting" it stops
Code: Select all
./sherpa.sh ew
On it! and we are back!OneCD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:14 am OK, let's try reinstalling Entware:This will restart all sherpa QPKGs afterward.Code: Select all
./sherpa.sh ew
Code: Select all
[/share/Public] # ./sherpa.sh ew
sherpa.sh (200216)
[ proc ] testing Internet access ...
[ done ] Internet is accessible
[ proc ] downloading file (Entware_1.02std.qpkg) ...
[ done ] downloaded file (Entware_1.02std.qpkg)
[ proc ] uninstalling 'Entware' ...
[ done ] uninstalled 'Entware'
[ proc ] installing file (Entware_1.02std.qpkg) - this can take a while ...
[ done ] installed file (Entware_1.02std.qpkg)
[ proc ] updating Entware package list ...
[ done ] updated Entware package list
[ proc ] calculating number and total size of IPKGs required ...
[ done ] 102 IPKGs (79MB) to be downloaded
[ proc ] downloading & installing 102 IPKGs ... 100% (79MB/79MB) done!
[ done ] downloaded & installed 102 IPKGs
[ proc ] downloading & installing PIP modules ...
[ done ] downloaded & installed PIP modules
[ proc ] restarting service 'SABnzbdplus' ...
[ done ] restarted service 'SABnzbdplus'
[ proc ] restarting service 'OMedusa' ...
[ done ] restarted service 'OMedusa'
[ done ] 'Entware' has been successfully reinstalled!
Code: Select all
* starting (OMedusa): -------------------- restart requested --------------------
= Mon Feb 17 22:19:07 CET 2020
= (OMedusa) is not active
= (OMedusa) is not active
* updating (OMedusa): OK
= result: 0
= PullGitRepo(): 'Already up to date.'
* starting (OMedusa): OK
= service configured for HTTP port: 7073
Great!
Considering none of the previous installs etc. caused error messages, it certainly seems so. Either way, you are my hero once again
It's there, but I'm not sure how many people notice it:dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:29 am I wonder if we could just do a "Common fixes to try" on the first post?
OneCD wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2017 2:05 pm Known issues
- Sometimes, it seems existing installations of Entware can become "difficult" to work with. So, Entware can also be reinstalled, but this should only be used as a last resort. Using:
... will force sherpa to uninstall your existing Entware QPKG, then install a new one. Please note: Entware will be reverted back to default, and only the IPKGs required to support your installed sherpa apps will be installed.Code: Select all
./sherpa.sh Entware
That's a good idea. This is now issue #33.dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:29 am I wonder, does it makes sense to include an update of the Entware modules when we install / reinstall something via sherpa?
Now I feel seen <_<OneCD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:38 amIt's there, but I'm not sure how many people notice it:dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:29 am I wonder if we could just do a "Common fixes to try" on the first post?OneCD wrote: ↑Sat May 06, 2017 2:05 pm Known issues
- Sometimes, it seems existing installations of Entware can become "difficult" to work with. So, Entware can also be reinstalled, but this should only be used as a last resort. Using:
... will force sherpa to uninstall your existing Entware QPKG, then install a new one. Please note: Entware will be reverted back to default, and only the IPKGs required to support your installed sherpa apps will be installed.Code: Select all
./sherpa.sh Entware
Brilliant! I do not think there should be any side effects and especially with modules like Openssl it makes plenty of sense. Thank you for adding that to the issue listOneCD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:38 amThat's a good idea. This is now issue #33.dirkonline wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 5:29 am I wonder, does it makes sense to include an update of the Entware modules when we install / reinstall something via sherpa?
I have multiple providers and have had incompletes before but they usually just abort..this has never happened before just wondering any flags in nzb post processing?OneCD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 4:37 amThe problem starts here:Without enough blocks, the downloaded files are incomplete and cannot be rebuilt.potestus wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 3:43 amCode: Select all
[5a41d13104cb4e20bc354b046ff55ebf] Verified in 47 seconds, repair is required [5a41d13104cb4e20bc354b046ff55ebf] Repair failed, not enough repair blocks (100 short)
Post-processing then continues to try and unpack and process an incomplete release, and it's all downhill from there.
This is expected behaviour.
The fix? You need more Usenet providers on separate backbones.
You can have incompletes where so much is missing, it's obvious to SABnzbd that there's no point continuing (example: an NZB with no PARs and a single missing article will trigger an abort).
This display shows only a single provider was tried. Your other providers are not shown here. Even if they don't have the required articles, they will still show a very low byte-count if they were queried.
Thanks.. failed downloading normally works with sickchill..but for some reason theOneCD wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2020 4:45 pmYou can have incompletes where so much is missing, it's obvious to SABnzbd that there's no point continuing (example: an NZB with no PARs and a single missing article will trigger an abort).
Then there are those (like the one indicated in your runtime output) where the download was mostly present and may have even included some PARs for repair, but not enough to actually fix it. It couldn't be determined until repair time that this was the case.
This display shows only a single provider was tried. Your other providers are not shown here. Even if they don't have the required articles, they will still show a very low byte-count if they were queried.
If your failed download handling is correctly configured, it's quite normal to see all the regular post-processing attempts on an unrepairable download. This is necessary so your searcher (for TV shows, movies, etc... ) will know what's going on, will then search for another release and send it to SABnzbd.
To be fair - it's been a bit hit-and-miss lately with SickChill and nzbToMedia. I've had downloads where (apparently) everything worked fine, only the show wasn't put into the correct place. And others where the logs indicated lots of errors, but in the end, the episode was fine and ended-up exactly where it should.
Yup!Forward Look wrote: ↑Thu Feb 20, 2020 12:50 am Is it possible to get one of the old CouchPotato2 .qpkgs ?
Code: Select all
cd /share/Public
opkg install python python-pyopenssl python-lxml
curl --insecure --output CouchPotato2_190928.qpkg https://raw.githubusercontent.com/OneCDOnly/sherpa/master/package-archives/CouchPotato2/build/CouchPotato2_190928.qpkg
sh CouchPotato2_190928.qpkg